Concerned about your own or
someone else’s drug use?

This study examines orally administered naltrexone-bupropion combination pharmacotherapy for people with methamphetamine use disorder in an outpatient setting. We will recruit 20 participants for a 12-week open-label clinical trial, with a follow-up 4 weeks after completion. Participants will receive a combination of naltrexone hydrochloride 40mg and bupropion per day for 12 weeks, with a 5-day taper at the beginning and end of the treatment period.

The primary outcomes are safety and feasibility to make sure the medication is safe to use, and that it is feasible to give the medication in this way.

Recruitment for this study is now closed.

This study aims to investigate the safety and feasibility of subanaesthetic ketamine in combination with psychotherapy (ketamine-assisted psychotherapy) for methamphetamine use disorder. We will recruit 20 adults who are seeking to reduce or cease methamphetamine use from a specialist outpatient stimulant treatment service in Sydney (St Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney). A four-week course of three subcutaneous ketamine doses (0.75mg/kg to 0.9mg/kg, depending on tolerability) at weekly intervals and four sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy (within 24-28 hours of each ketamine administration session) will be delivered. There will be three follow-up visits (Week 8, 12 and 24) to assess outcomes. The primary outcome is to investigate safety and feasibility; other outcomes assessed are changes in methamphetamine use, cravings and withdrawal, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction.

This is a single-site, uncontrolled, open-label feasibility study. Adults who are treatment-resistant injecting opioid dependent will be offered up to 24 months of twice daily supervised parenteral hydromorphone plus oral long-acting opioid treatment followed by 3 months oral methadone treatment. Dosage range 50-400 mg/day (maximum 200 mg/dose). This is followed by transition to Opioid Agonist Therapy (OAT) as per standard of care.  The study will be conducted over 182 weeks, 104 of which are study treatment duration. The target sample size is 30 participants, with a minimum of 20 participants.

The study will investigate the feasibility, safety, and cost of time-limited injectable hydromorphone treatment. Feasibility will be assessed by recruitment, stabilisation on treatment, and (within 24 months) the outcome of transfer of people with treatment-resistant opioid use disorder to standard OAT.

The combination of accessible, sustainable treatment means this approach to Supervised Injectable Opioid Treatment (SIOT) has the potential to enhance the effectiveness of OAT as a public health measure. 

To help engage people who consume methamphetamine (MA) in treatment earlier, the Stimulant Treatment Program (STP) at St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney (SVHS) established the Stimulant Check-Up Clinic (S-Check). The S-Check service model of care provides strengths-based, bio-psychosocial assessments, aiming to engage people who consume MA who have not previously accessed treatment to increase their knowledge and awareness to change behaviour, reduce harms, and seek treatment before problematic use begins or becomes entrenched. An initial study, Feasibility and efficacy of the S-Check App: A harm reduction and early intervention smartphone application for methamphetamine use, investigated the translation of the service model to a mobile app with an aim to develop knowledge of MA risks and harms among people not engaged in traditional modes of treatment, and to encourage help-seeking.

We have redeveloped the app based on qualitative data from the initial S-Check study. For the current S-Check app, we will recruit participants for a prospective cohort study which seeks to describe the demographic and MA use profile of a cohort of individuals who use a smartphone app to address their MA use. There is no target for recruitment. All participants will download the app and have ongoing access for the 24-month duration of the study. Follow-up questionnaires will be administered at 28-day intervals.

This study examines a tapering dose of lisdexamfetamine in addition to treatment as usual in a population of adults being treated for methamphetamine withdrawal in an inpatient setting. We will recruit 15 people for a 7-day inpatient open-label safety and feasibility study with weekly follow up for 3 weeks post discharge. Participants will receive 250mg of lisdexamfetamine on day 1 of their admission tapered by 50mg per day to 50mg on day 5. Days 6 and 7 are medication free to monitor for withdrawal symptoms and ensure participants are stimulant free upon discharge. The primary outcome is safety and feasibility with secondary outcomes of acceptability, retention in treatment, withdrawal symptoms and craving, and effects on sleep.

The aim of The LiMA Study is to test if lisdexamfetamine is effective in reducing methamphetamine use, cravings and withdrawal symptoms. 180 people with methamphetamine dependence will be recruited to the LiMA Study, which will be conducted in specialist treatment centres in Sydney, Newcastle, Adelaide and Melbourne. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a 15-week intervention consisting of induction (1 week of 150mg lisdexamfetamine [LDX] or placebo), maintenance (12 weeks of 250mg LDX or placebo) and reduction (1 week of 150mg LDX or placebo and 1 week of 50mg LDX or placebo). All participants will be given access to 4 sessions of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) as treatment-as-usual and receive a 4-week follow up appointment. A full protocol for the study has been published here.

The LiMA study is no longer recruiting. This study has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, Australia (HREC/16/SVH/222).

GHB harms are increasing in Australia, with a significant increase in people coming to the emergency department with GHB toxicity. However, no research has sought to understand how, why and where people who identify as heterosexual and cisgender or transgender use GHB. We are hoping you can help shed some light.

The GHB Cultures, Experiences and Practices Study is the first Australian study to specifically examine GHB use among heterosexual and cisgender or transgender people. This study will explore the varied ways that people use GHB, the benefits and harms associated with GHB use and strategies that heterosexual cisgender or transgender people use to prevent harms.

The knowledge generated by this study will be used to inform the delivery of harm-reduction resources and health and wellbeing programs. The National Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs are leading this research in partnership with researchers from the St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney, University of New South Wales, The University of Sydney and La Trobe University.

This study has been approved by the St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (REF:2021/ETH11824).

Neither substance use nor sexual behaviour is inherently ‘risky’, but we do know that there is some relationship with transmission of HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and other blood-borne viruses (BBVs). We therefore need to make sure we have a way to effectively measure risk behaviours.

The Substance Use and Sex Index (SUSI) seeks to address these issues and has been developed by a group of researchers at The University of Tasmania, The University of NSW and The University of Sydney. An advisory group made up of Australian community experts and clinicians provides expertise and guidance over the tool’s development. Version 1 of the tool was piloted in 2016 as an anonymous online questionnaire. Based on feedback and review of the piloted tool, version 2 is an online questionnaire to be completed anonymously.

The new SUSI tool will provide a more effective way of measuring risk behaviours compared with tools that are currently in use. SUSI has the potential to support the effective treatment of substance use disorders as well as support effective prevention, treatment and care relating to HIV, STIs and BBVs. If you would like further information on the study, or would like to participate, go to the SUSI website by clicking here. (Approved by St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee, reference number: LNR/18/SVH/31; and the ACON Research Ethics Committee reference number: 2018/02)

Methamphetamine use can lead to a wide variety of complex physical, psychological and social problems. Globally, women are under-represented in treatments for substance use disorders, making up a third of those who use drugs, but only a fifth of those in treatment.  Specialist treatment programs which provide non-judgmental harm minimisation and risk stratification are increasing, but little is known on whether women have appropriate access to such services or if there are specific needs which should be addressed to encourage engagement. There is a lack of qualitative research into the gendered experiences of women who access services for methamphetamine, and the potential barriers to treatment. In this study, the experiences of women who were frequent (at least weekly) users of methamphetamine, but were not engaged in treatment were explored. 11 semi-structured interviews were conducted at four sites in inner Sydney with women who use methamphetamine. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and continued until saturation had been reached. Thematic analysis using Nvivo® software is now being carried out.

Ethics approval for the study was granted by the Human Research Ethics Committee of St. Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney (Approval LNR/15/SVH/469).

Gamma Hydroxybutyrate (GHB)  (and its precursors, gamma-butyrolactone [GBL] and 1,4-butanediol [1,4-BD]), at high doses, becomes a potent central nervous system depressant. GHB is a recreational ‘party drug’, consumed at festivals or other night-time settings (pubs, clubs). GHB carries a high risk for harms, including coma due to overdose; dependence and withdrawal; and polydrug complications; all of which often require intervention.

GHB associated harms are increasing worldwide, including in Australia. In one Australian study of 76 people who used GHB, half experienced overdose with loss of consciousness. Between 2012 and 2019 there was a 147% increase in the prevalence rates of GHB-related ambulance attendances in Victoria (n=5,866 attendances in 7 years).

There is a relatively low prevalence of GHB use among the general population in Australia (0.1% of adults within the previous 12 months), however gay and bisexual men (GBM) report using GHB at a rate nearly 20 times greater than the general population. In the SWASH periodic survey of lesbian, bisexual and queer (LBQ) women in Sydney, 2.6% of 1,272 participants had used GHB. No Australian studies have reported the prevalence of GHB use among trans and gender diverse populations; however, in the 2018 Australian Trans and Gender Diverse Sexual Health Survey, 15.8% of 1,632 participants reported sexualised drug use within the last 12 months.

Rationale

Despite heightened prevalence of use there are no specific qualitative data to generate understandings of social and cultural components of GHB use among LGBTQ Australians. Most research on GHB consumption among LGBTQ populations has considered GHB use in sexual contexts, with exclusive focus on GBM. Little research has examined GHB use among broader LGBTQ communities, nor examined the contexts of GHB use, its functions and impacts.

Dominant theories that explain drug use among LGBTQ populations do not adequately capture the complexity of the phenomenon and as a result are of limited utility to health promotion, clinical and other alcohol and other drug sector practitioners. One such theory, the minority stress theory, hypothesizes that members of minority groups encounter discrimination at a societal level resulting in stressors abated by substance use. This perspective does not capture the role that drugs play in sociability, pleasure and belonging.

This study will be the first Australian study to qualitatively describe the contextual and cultural practices associated with GHB consumption across LGBTQ communities. These data will allow for evidence-based programmatic outputs at three partner organisations, ACON, Thorne Harbour Health (THH) and the Western Australian AIDS Council (WAAC).

In 2016, a smartphone application based on the S-Check service model of care, the S-Check App, was developed by the Stimulant Treatment Program at St Vincent’s Hospital Sydney , to expand and enhance service provision. The aim of the app is to reduce problematic methamphetamine (MA) use through i) engaging MA users who are not seeking traditional modes of treatment, and ii) developing app users’ knowledge of MA and the risks and harms associated with MA use. The app provides self-assessment of social health and lifestyle, physical health, sexual health and psychological wellbeing. Feedback is provided along with support resources and information on MA. App users can track their MA and its associated risks over time. A 2017 pilot study of the S-Check app supported its acceptability and ease of use from a consumer perspective.

Evaluation of an updated version of the app via a randomised wait-list controlled trial (259 participants) showed that the intervention group reported almost double the rate of seeking professional help compared to controls. Further, increased app engagement was linked to a higher likelihood of seeking help and a decrease in MA use. This study has informed the current project: S-Check cohort study: a smartphone application for methamphetamine use .

To focus the clinical research efforts of the Centre, the NCCRED priority setting study (2019) engaged nationally with key alcohol and other drug clinical, research, and consumer stakeholders in Australia to determine clinical research priorities. The study undertook the guidance provided in the Nine Common Themes of Good Practice, a published checklist for guiding research priority setting procedures. These are: context; comprehensiveness of approach; inclusiveness; information gathering; planning for implementation; criteria; methods for deciding on priorities; evaluation; transparency.

The study consisted of four phases: 1) an online survey of stakeholders; 2) a qualitative thematic analysis (assessment of survey responses); 3) a brief literature review assessing the themes identified by respondents against published peer-reviewed data, and; 4) presentation of all results and literature reviews to an independent expert panel. The NCCRED Methamphetamine and Emerging Drugs Clinical Research Network working group functioned as the expert panel. Results were ranked, and the top three priorities for methamphetamine clinical research and the top three priorities for emerging drugs clinical research were presented to NCCRED and the NCCRED Board.

For methamphetamine:

• Overcoming barriers to intervention uptake (e.g at time of crisis in emergency departments or primary health care)
• Pilot pharmacotherapy trials for adults seeking treatment
• Effective communication strategies for consumers on available treatments and the evidence-based options

For emerging drugs:

• Fixed-site community-located drug checking / pill testing (connected to an early warning system)
• Feasibility of social media and other creative opportunities to alert consumers and reduce harm
• GHB overdose and withdrawal management
• Early warning system / shared information – pooling and sharing information and assessing the impact of reducing harm

Background: Methamphetamine (MA) dependence is a growing global health issue with no effective pharmacotherapy. Lisdexamfetamine (LDX) is approved for use in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and binge eating disorder (BED) in doses ranging from 30 to 70mg/day. LDX has a longer duration of action and lower abuse potential than other amphetamines, and presents a promising candidate for agonist-type treatment of MA dependence. People seeking treatment for MA dependence may require doses of LDX higher than used in ADHD and BED. We examined the safety of LDX at 250mg/day among adults with MA dependence, approximately equivalent to previously trialled doses of dexamphetamine.

Methods: We conducted a dose-escalating, phase-2, open label, single-group study of oral LDX at two Australian drug treatment services. Eligible participants were MA dependent adults who reported use of MA on at least 14 of the preceding 28 days. Once daily, supervised LDX doses of 100 to 250mg/day were provided as a single-blinded, ascending-descending dose regimen over 8 weeks. The primary outcomes were safety, drug tolerability, and regimen completion at the end of Week 4 (maximum dose). Participants were followed through to Week 12. Secondary outcomes included: change in MA use; craving; withdrawal; severity of dependence; risk behaviour; change in other substance use; medication acceptability; potential for non-prescription use; adherence; and neurocognitive functioning.

Results: Fourteen of 16 participants (87.5%) successfully completed the four week escalation regimen to 250mg/day. Two participants withdrew from the trial in the first week. No participant was withdrawn due to adverse events. MA use decreased significantly (p=0.013) from a median of 21 days (IQR: 16-23) to 13 days (IQR: 11-17) over the four week escalation period.

Conclusions: LDX at a dose of up to 250 mg/day was safe and well tolerated in this population, with high retention. Larger trials of LDX as a pharmacotherapy for MA dependence are warranted.

Trial Registration : Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12615000391572.